Our Research Process
Our Research Process: A Transparent Guide to Scientific supplement Reviews
In the largely unregulated supplement industry, consumers deserve reliable, evidence-based information. Our commitment to a rigorous Scientific Review Process ensures you receive trustworthy evaluations based on scientific evidence rather than marketing claims. This transparency allows you to make informed decisions about supplements that may impact your health and wellbeing.
The Four Pillars of Our Scientific Review Process
Our supplement evaluations stand on four essential pillars that ensure comprehensive, unbiased, and scientifically sound reviews. Each pillar represents a critical component of our methodology designed to provide you with the most accurate information possible.
1. Extensive Research
In-depth analysis of scientific studies, clinical trials, and composition data from reliable sources.
2. Ingredient Analysis
Detailed evaluation of each ingredient’s efficacy, dosage accuracy, bioavailability, and safety profile.
3. Market Comparison
Comprehensive assessment of pricing, alternatives, and overall value compared to similar products.
4. Total Transparency
Full disclosure of commercial relationships while maintaining complete editorial independence.
Extensive Internet Research: The Foundation of Our Scientific Review Process
Before writing any supplement review, we conduct thorough research using reputable scientific sources. This critical first step ensures our evaluations are based on evidence rather than manufacturer claims or popular opinion.
Our Research Methodology
- Systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific literature from databases like PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar
- Analysis of clinical trials and their methodological quality (randomization, blinding, sample size)
- Examination of meta-analyses that combine results from multiple studies
- Review of supplement composition data and manufacturer specifications
- Consultation with scientific advisory boards and independent researchers when necessary
“The scientific method is the foundation of our review process. We examine the evidence with the same critical eye that researchers use in the peer review process.”
Research Tools We Utilize
Primary Sources
- PubMed and MEDLINE for peer-reviewed medical literature
- ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing and completed clinical trials
- Cochrane Database for systematic reviews
- FDA and NIH databases for regulatory information
Secondary Sources
- Industry reports and white papers
- Professional medical and nutrition journals
- University research publications
- Manufacturer documentation and certificates of analysis
See Our Research in Action
Want to see how we apply our Scientific Review Process to real supplements?
Ingredient Analysis: The Core of Our Scientific Review Process
Once we’ve gathered the scientific literature, we conduct a detailed analysis of each ingredient in the supplement. This critical evaluation helps determine whether a product contains effective ingredients at appropriate dosages.
Our Ingredient Evaluation Criteria
Efficacy
We assess whether ingredients have demonstrated effects in peer-reviewed studies, noting the strength of evidence (from preliminary to conclusive).
Dosage Accuracy
We compare the supplement’s dosages with those proven effective in clinical studies, identifying underdosed or overdosed ingredients.
Bioavailability
We evaluate how well ingredients are absorbed and utilized by the body, including the impact of specific forms and delivery systems.
Safety Assessment
- Identification of potential side effects based on clinical literature
- Evaluation of ingredient interactions that may enhance or diminish effects
- Assessment of contraindications for specific health conditions or medications
- Review of allergen information and manufacturing quality controls
Red Flags We Look For
- Proprietary blends that mask individual ingredient amounts
- Underdosed ingredients that fall below clinically effective thresholds
- Novel ingredients with limited or no human research
- Questionable additives like artificial colors, preservatives, or fillers
- Misleading claims that aren’t supported by scientific evidence
Market Comparison: Contextualizing Products in Our Scientific Review Process
A supplement doesn’t exist in isolation. Our Scientific Review Process includes a thorough market comparison to help you understand how a product stacks up against alternatives in terms of formulation, price, and overall value.
Price Analysis Methodology
We calculate the true cost of supplements using several metrics:
- Cost per serving based on recommended dosage
- Cost per active ingredient (especially for single-ingredient supplements)
- Price relative to market averages for similar formulations
- Subscription discounts and bulk purchase options
Value Assessment Framework
Our value score considers multiple factors beyond just price:
Sample Comparison Table
| Product | Price | Key Ingredients | Value Score |
| Example Brand X | $49.99 | Ingredient A, B | ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ |
| Example Brand Y | $39.99 | Ingredient A, C | ⭐️⭐️⭐ |
| Example Brand Z | $59.99 | Ingredient A, B, D | ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ |
Alternative Products Assessment
We research and evaluate alternative products that may offer:
Potential Advantages
- Superior ingredient quality or forms
- More comprehensive formulations
- Better value for specific health goals
- Stronger scientific backing
Potential Disadvantages
- Higher cost without proportional benefits
- Unnecessary ingredients
- Less research supporting formulation
- Quality control concerns
Total Transparency: The Ethical Foundation of Our Scientific Review Process
Trust is earned through transparency. Our Scientific Review Process includes complete disclosure of our business relationships and a commitment to editorial independence that puts your interests first.
Our Editorial Independence Pledge
- Reviews are based solely on scientific evidence and objective analysis
- Affiliate relationships never influence our ratings or recommendations
- We decline partnerships with brands that don’t meet our scientific standards
- Our research team operates independently from commercial considerations
- We clearly distinguish between scientific facts and editorial opinions
“Transparency is not just about disclosing relationships—it’s about maintaining rigorous standards regardless of commercial interests.”
How We Handle Conflicts of Interest
We take several steps to ensure our Scientific Review Process remains unbiased:
- Clear disclosure of affiliate and sponsorship relationships
- Separation between research/editorial and business operations
- Consistent evaluation criteria applied to all products regardless of partnerships
- Regular review of our methodology by independent scientific advisors
- Commitment to updating reviews when new research emerges
Frequently Asked Questions About Our Scientific Review Process
How do you select which supplements to review?
We select supplements based on market popularity, reader requests, emerging trends, and scientific interest. Our goal is to provide reviews for products that consumers are actively searching for or considering purchasing.
Do manufacturers have input in your review process?
No. While we may contact manufacturers to verify factual information about ingredients or manufacturing processes, they have no input in our evaluation criteria, testing methodology, or final ratings.
How often do you update your reviews?
We update reviews when significant new research emerges, formulations change, or at least annually to ensure information remains current. The date of the most recent update is always displayed on each review.
What qualifications does your research team have?
Our team includes researchers with backgrounds in nutrition science, pharmacology, biochemistry, and related fields. We also consult with independent experts when specialized knowledge is required.
The Scientific Review Process: Our Commitment to Evidence-Based Supplement Reviews
Our rigorous Scientific Review Process ensures you receive trustworthy, evidence-based information about supplements. By combining extensive research, detailed ingredient analysis, comprehensive market comparisons, and total transparency, we provide the guidance you need to make informed decisions about your health.
We believe that scientific evidence should be the foundation of any supplement decision. While marketing claims and testimonials abound, our commitment to a systematic, evidence-based approach sets us apart in an industry often lacking scientific rigor.
Stay Informed with Science-Backed Supplement Reviews
Join our community to receive the latest evidence-based supplement reviews and health insights delivered directly to your inbox.
🔗 Featured Supplement Reviews
🧬 Best Natural GLP-1 Supplements
Ozempic alternatives for weight management
🍄 Best Nootropic Mushrooms
Lion’s Mane vs Cordyceps for brain health
👩⚕️ Best Femtech Supplements
PCOS & hormonal balance solutions
⏳ Best Longevity Supplements
NAD+, NMN & anti-aging stack guide